Slaughterhouse Five is an especially important book because I am one of those people who can't read enough war novels, or watch enough movies (in fact within ten feet sits a three volume set of books detailing American involvement in World War Two, and yes they were a gift for me). Vonnegut is clearly not writing this book to glamorize war, or war art for that matter. But how is he doing so? To answer that question I want to explore a little bit of what makes movie war heroes into heroes. One quick note, for the purposes of this post I will be referring to male heroes. I just want to note now that there is no deeper meaning behind this except the majority of western art depicting war has focused on men. A movie to take on the task of examining the response to a female heroine would be Courage Under Fire, which I highly recommend.
Personality: As far as I can identify, there are two types of personalities that make war heroes. There is the guy who everyone hates because he's a cocky jerk who doesn't play nice with others. Yet, in the face of danger he routs the enemy and saves his fellow countrymen. It is his belief that he is the best that allows him to be the hero, because he knows that not only his he the best, he is so much better than everyone else that they fear him. Top Gun is a prime example, Maverick (Tom Cruise) is this man, no question about it. The other type is the quiet unassuming man, hard working yet never a standout who in the face of battle finds his voice and successfully leads his men out. Damian Lewis' portrayal of Dick Winters in Band of Brothers shows this type of hero. He is catapulted during the war to higher and higher positions of authority, all the while still maintaining his unassuming personality.
Style: This may not seem as obvious, but since the beginning of action movies, style has played a big role in pointing out the hero and the villain. In thirties movies it was the color of hats (white and black of course). As America became more militarily active, the color of the uniforms, even if they weren't actually Russian, German, Chinese, etc. was meant to show the audience who to cry over. Even today in police movies, think about how the main character is normally dressed--he's probably wearing a suit but not a nice one, and doesn't look very comfortable in it. Off duty he probably wears a hoodie while he still tries to solve the case. The bad guys can be classified as gangsters or gangstas depending on the dress. Big imposing men in suits belong to the gangster realm, while the typically young gangsta has more jewelry, more tattoos and baggier clothing. Think of the famous Louis-David painting of Napoleon crossing the Alps, do you not get a sense of his power and strength by how is he dressed, and his flair while being perilously close to death?
Humanity and Self-Sacrifice: What sets apart heroes from villains often is not the amount of people they kill but their reason and feelings behind it. Villians kill for themselves, heroes kill because they have no choice. When James Bond kills Steven Obanno in Casino Royale it was because Bond was attacked and his kill is to save himself and Lynd. You can see his pain in a later scene in the shower though, how much of a toll it takes on him to be constantly flying around the world and killing people. Self-sacrifice is also important in the building of a hero. In Air Force One a random F-14 pilot throws his plane in the way of a missile to stop hit from hitting Air Force One and killing the President. Or in Captains of the Clouds, after a German pilot has destroyed two of the unarmed bombers, James Cagney steers his plane right at the German to bring him down. In both movies, the pilots know that this action will result in their death, and yet they still do it, for the mission is more important than their own life.
In a nutshell, those things make a hero. Billy Pilgrim doesn't fit any of those things specifically, Vonnegut goes to great lengths to make sure he clearly doesn't. Roland Weary looks more like a gangster than a hero. The scouts leave men behind. The British are closer, but their noble duty-bound attempts to escape look foolish because their in the middle or a Russian POW camp, and their cavorting with the Germans is not very heroic. Edgar Derby is probably the closest thing to a hero in Slaughterhouse Five, but with repeated assurances that he will die over a teapot by the end of a novel, this undermines his budding heroism. For what Vonnegut is trying to accomplish, it makes sense to not make a hero out of any character. That way, people like me don't read it like an exciting, flag waving war novel.
I'm not sure if this is exactly related, but you talking about "war art" made me think of stencil art in Iraq and Afghanistan.
ReplyDeletehttp://img.addfunny.com/funnypictures/little/55/afghanistanstencilart.jpg
Soldiers, typically American as far as I know, stationed in Afghanistan, have been putting up art on the strategic concrete walls erected for their defenses. For the most part, senior officers and administration have no intentions of reprimanding those involved or destroying the art, like traditional grafitti.
http://www.iconophilia.net/art-where-youd-least-expect-it/
A lot of the art is, like Vonnegut's work, undermining of war in general and the situation the soldiers are involved in there. But, at the same time, it also doesn't give any clear cut "this is what we should do" messages, either.
http://boingboing.net/images/stayclassy.jpg
The personalities behind the art are unknown, mysterious, and not heroic in the slightest. Their style, reminiscent of Banksy in the civilian sector, does not portray them as great heroes gone to freedom-ize the people of Iraq and Afghanistan. They're stuck there just like everybody else is stuck wherever they are. In a sense, they do everything unlike how "war heroes" should be portrayed. Have you seen much of this?